By Roland Betancourt
Lady
Gaga sings, “I can feel my heart beating in your hands, my aura and yours
meeting in this dance, pull the trigger I’m ready, it’s show time” – probably
an excerpt from a rumored forthcoming song, “Aura.” The camera focuses closely
on her face, which is set into a white two-dimensional square that seems to evoke
the white modernist canvas, and, in particular, the square as a manifestation of this medium – recalling an iconic modernist
work, such as Malevich’s Black Square (1915),
whose intellectual heritage is directly traced to the Russo-Byzantine icon.
Here, we see Gaga as an icon set in a flat two-dimensional space. Particularly,
it speaks to the miraculous image of Christ impressed on cloth, known as the
image of Edessa in the Eastern Christian church, attested in an image such as
the Holy Face of Genoa.
In
this moment, Lady Gaga’s body operates as the medium for the Video Music Awards,
since the show begins from this space – she is an emblematic, bodily
manifestation of the flat white canvas. Upon her body, Lady Gaga has wrapped
into herself the modernist white cube of the museum and its blank canvas. As
the camera zooms out, her body is revealed to be clad in an elaborate dress
with large shoulders and gown.
Her
costume recalls the experimental performance pieces of Hugo Ball, (of the
Zurich branch of Dada) – and in particular it recalls “The Magical Bishop”
performance from 1916 at the Cabaret Voltaire. This performance revolved around
the recitation of nonsensical, sound poetry – such as “Karawane.” Not only did
such a performance, along with the similar poetic compositions of the
Futurists, bring the sonic into the field of the visual arts, it also set the
foundations for the development of performance art. In a sense, the work of
Hugo Ball and his contemporaries functions as an origin myth that establishes
the foundations that make possible the ARTPOP
project. It is Gaga’s Ur-medium.
The
religious association suggested by the comparison to the icon is also stressed
by the fact that this costume references the Born This Way era, as it is similar to the “Bloody Mary” costume of
the Born This Way Ball, where Gaga
appears as the Trinity with two backup dancers, the three of them moving
mechanically along in unison throughout the stage (an aspect that Meghan Vicks
has expertly discussed here). This song explicitly addresses the
apocryphal narrative of Mary Magdalene following the death of Christ as
detailed in the medieval Golden Legend.
Note,
in particular, the string of pearls around her neck. These are a curious
addition that gender the figure as feminine. In this context, it would seem
that Gaga operates as the allegorical manifestation of the tabula rasa – the blank slate of the medium – configured as the
body of the feminine. This femininity is crucial: allegorical figures are often
depicted through images of women. But furthermore, as I discussed earlier, because
of its image-bearing, reproductive capacities, the feminine has come to be
associated with a site of unregulated, infinite viral reproduction in pop
culture – a notion that bears a striking intellectual resemblance with the
notion chora, (translated as space), as described in Plato’s Timaeus.
For
Plato, chora is the ever-receiving
receptacle from which all forms emerge. It can never be described or made fully
manifest, but only approximated through a form of “bastard reasoning,” or through
metaphor and analogy. Thus, he likens the chora
to a nurse of becoming, the virgin wax upon which forms are impressed, or a
mother. While Jacques Derrida would come to characterize chora as wholly imperceptible, John Sallis would later counter that
in Plato’s cosmogony, chora can be said to be perceptible –
perhaps not as a realized form, but rather through its movements: through the
tremors and quakes that occur in the chora
as forms come into being and change form.
In
this opening image, Gaga takes on the
notion of chora as a site of
generativity who lacks being in its
own right, but who can be made
manifest through the movements of forms emerging upon her. The performance takes
on an iterative process whereby we begin
to see Gaga cycling through her key eras – from Born This Way to The Fame to The
Fame Monster (and Born This Way)
and on to the present ARTPOP.
This trope naturally riffs on the popular “Evolution of Dance” viral video, and
thereby generates not only the idea of nostalgia or a career retrospective (as
many have been quick to observe), but also the idea of a historical emplacement
and self-aware knowledge, captured by the line “we just like to read.”
After
the camera pans out, we hear the jeers and boos of an audience; while many
bloggers alleged that these were real boos, it turns out that they were simulated
– they were part of Gaga’s audio track. The boos and jeers respond directly to
the opening lines of the song, transitioning us from this virginal, formless
space into the domain of the critic – as if her form is forged from the
critique and jeers. This, of course, speaks directly to the current themes of
the ARTPOP project, which argues that
“Lady Gaga is Over” in the promotional Haus film by the same name (which I have
discussed here
previously).
On
stage, she is joined by a series of backup dancers wearing black leotards and skullcaps.
This costume cleverly manifests the true medium condition of Lady Gaga,
allowing for her quick transition between various costumes. Additionally, this
costuming operates as a minimalist rendition of the Pierrot figure, and – as I
have discussed here and here – Pierrot’s
association with a medium condition is heightened by this costuming. However,
in this case we do not see the white body of Pierrot, but are rather presented
with the black leotard fitting neatly over bodies as the true medium of Lady
Gaga’s performance – mechanically allowing her to cycle through a series of
quick costume changes. Hence, the original flatness of the modernist medium is
subverted – demonstrated to be an artificial construct, as artificial a
construct as any other apparatus of the body.
Lady
Gaga uses this medium condition of the black leotard and skullcap to transition
through her various phases – and the perceptibility of the medium is only made
visible through the movement of different forms (different versions of Gaga)
manifesting. That is, the medium is
perceptible only in witnessing the manifestations and transitions of forms
through its space, but not as an ontological category, which can be reduced
to flatness, whiteness, or two-dimensionality (as art historians and critics
Clement Greenberg, Michael Fried, and Rosalind Krauss would champion in the
height of post-war, late-modernist art). The flatness of the paper-cutout
backdrop further plays with these notions: not only does its flatness manifest
images through the cutout silhouettes, but also its color is constantly in a
state of flux, changing according to the lights shined upon it.
At
first, she takes on the image of The Fame’s
Lady Gaga, with her blue bedazzled skirt and blazer, and iconic blond bob.
While in this era, (which first articulated the artistic drive of her project
before having the full capacities to enact its realities), the song mentions
her own transition from being a “Koons fan” into being the “Koons” herself.
Interestingly, as she references pop-artist Jeff Koons, Lady Gaga and her
dancers take blue gazing balls into their hands, much like the ones you would
find in a kitschy garden.
This
operates as an explicit reference to Koons’s recent series “Gazing
Ball,”
which deploys white plaster copies of famous artworks and riffs on them, while
adding this signature gazing ball into their compositions. As such, Gaga has doubly
cited Koons in her lyrics and
performance, and has also cited a series that operates on the white, malleable
matter of plaster as a way of articulating the reproducibility of art and its
circulation within a popular economy.
Then,
she is formed into The Fame Monster (and
arguably Born This Way) era’s blond skunk-roots wig, which was
featured in the “Telephone” music video, and which also made an appearance in
the caged Gaga of the “Applause” video. The heightened, garish blond of the
wig, as I have described previously, alludes not only to Andy Warhol’s
renditions of Marilyn Monroe, but also to Madonna’s own citation of Andy Warhol
on the Celebration album cover,
making this a particularly salient image.
It
is significant that she is presented her wig by a dancer who carries a
mannequin head on each of his shoulders – which reads as if the wigs for The Fame and The Fame Monster came from those very
mannequin heads on his shoulders. The two mannequin heads on the shoulders of
one body indicate that The Fame and The Fame Monster are two sides of the
same coin, operating as a two-faced Janus-like creature, with the tabula rasa dancer positioned between
the two as a literal site of mediation. This recalls the same trope Gaga used
when posing with Shangela following the drag performance of “Applause,” where
the two of them held together the blank bust of a Styrofoam head, an issue I
discussed earlier.
In Terry Richardson’s images for the performance’s rehearsal, the wigs are
precisely mounted on such heads. Here, Gaga has an animate, moving, breathing
wig-bearer.
During
this very stage, another dancer approaches Gaga and speckles her face with
paint, creating an allusion to the iconic cover art for “Applause”, which
worked well with the leotard – reminiscent of the Pierrot costume. It is
important to note, however, that the
paint is dabbed off a painter’s palette, which suggests, once again, that Lady Gaga
is precisely an artistic medium whose
veritable manifestation is only made visible via her rapid-fire, successive
permutations and transformations. Her face is messily streaked with the
primary colors, which suggests that Gaga is not a fully manifest artwork, but
rather contains all the primers and basic rubrics for the enactment of art – art
existing as a potentiality, but not yet (or ever) fully embodied.
The
key to these two figures – the wig-bearer and the painter – is that they are not dancers: they are Gaga’s actual hair
stylist and makeup artist. Her hair stylist, Frederic “Freddie” Aspiras, wears
the two heads, which (as we can tell from Terry Richardson’s useful rehearsal
and preshow pictures) are simply Styrofoam wig heads that have been
spray-painted black. This is why he does not join the dancers and exits the
stage after every change. Tara Savelo, Gaga’s makeup artist, appears to be the
painter with the palette, streaking Gaga’s face with colors. While she carries
the palette over her face, hiding her visage, we can tell by her profile that
this is Savelo – this is corroborated by the fact that in one of Richardson’s
images, we see Savelo in full makeup and in profile.
Superficially,
it makes sense that Lady Gaga would want her hair person on hand to strap on
her wigs, given that a wig malfunction would undermine the fluidity and speed
of the transitions. However, Savelo’s appearance causes us to question a purely
practical reading of this inclusion: after all, the streaking of color could
surely have been accomplished by any of her dancers. This is not to say the
color was haphazardly applied. In fact, Terry Richardson’s images also
demonstrate the various makeup tests that were done until the proper
combination was achieved, which lends extra significance to the choice of
colors and the way they are applied to Gaga’s face. Nevertheless, it would not have
been a difficult task to train one of her dancers (who clothed her in The Fame transition) to dab on the
streaks of color. One of her skilled dancers could surely have also been
trained to put her wig on.
So
it seems that Gaga wanted her actual hair and makeup team to have a presence on
the stage. Note that while Aspiras stands stoically in the spotlight, Savelo
does not seem as comfortable and chooses to hide her face with the palette – as
if concealing the very object she is there to operate on (i.e. the face), or
perhaps even to conceal the fact that her makeup, done specifically for the
award ceremony, might not match that of the dancers around her. Whatever the
reason, the inconspicuous nature of their appearances should not be mistaken
for a desire to disguise or wholly conceal their presence. Like the jazz-hands
that “cover” the placement of her Fame
wig, these acts of hair and makeup are embraced through a thin veil of
misdirection. In fact, we are confronted precisely with their operation: their
liminal and transitory action both becomes visible itself, and makes visible
the quakes and shivers of Gaga’s body-as-medium metamorphosing before us.
Finally,
we encounter a stripped Lady Gaga in her seashell attire and Venus wig,
signifying the ARTPOP rebirth of Lady
Gaga. Notice that for this costume change, she leaves the stage for a period of
time rather than just changing onstage as before – despite the fact that it appears
she is already wearing the seashell bikini underneath the leotard. This literal
absence from the stage manifests her actual absence from the stage in the
period before ARTPOP, following her
injury. Here, the imagery is straightforward as she manifests the current stage
of her work through the guise of Venus, particularly in a manner similar to
that of Botticelli, who depicted the birth
of Venus in his well-known image.
We
must view this process, then, as Lady Gaga demonstrating herself not through a
nostalgic rehashing of her career, but rather through the infinite malleability
of her image over time in rapid-fire succession. In a moment where she is expected to top herself, Gaga has chosen to
meet that challenge not with some new
aesthetic form, but rather by manifesting
herself as a state of being through which an infinite succession and iteration
of images are always flowing – she is always topping herself.
Hence,
she has made her point not by playing into the game, but by simply pointing out
that she is that game itself.
Author bio:
Click here to follow Gaga Stigmata on Twitter.























Beautiful analysis. I really like you final statement of 'She has made her point by not playing into the game, buut by simply pointing out that she is the game'. It reminds me so much about during the BTW era in the Google interview. She said 'I don’t want to be part of the machine. I want the machine to be part of me'.I just feel these quotes seem to connect!
ReplyDelete