By
Ayah Rifai
Mother Monster is miffed.
Following a succession of tweets calling for an end to fan wars, excessive
gossip, and blogger criticisms after leaks of her new single, “Applause,”
surfaced on the Internet, Gaga implores us to change our ways and enter into a
post-critical age of pop music so that artists may do what they’re best at:
entertaining us.
In my previous
contribution to Gaga Stigmata,
I argue that what distinguishes Gaga from other pop artists in the music scene
today is her contemporary realization of a Gesamtkunstwerk,
a “total artwork” that synthesizes music, drama, poetry, the material arts,
choreography, and technology into a unified project. Now that the era of ARTPOP is upon us, Gaga does not
disappoint: she remains true to her aesthetic with the release of “Applause.”
As Roland Betancourt was
the first to point
out, Gaga’s prelude to the forthcoming experience of ARTPOP, her fourth album, begins with
her embodiment of the stock character Pierrot on the “Applause” album cover
through her powder-white face, clown-like makeup (colorful and deliberately
messy), black skullcap, and flowing white cloth in the background (harkening
back to the loose, white clothing that Pierrot typically wore).
The trope of Pierrot
originated in sixteenth-century Italy with the Commedia dell’Arte, a traveling
troupe that performed various theatrical genres in which music was a standard
feature. Pierrot the pantomime emerged as one of the most prominent standard
characters. As Pierrot’s persona developed into that of the sad, isolated,
wandering clown (one performer in the collective known as les saltimbanques), he
gained popularity over the centuries and directly inspired numerous works of
art, literature, music, photography, and film (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierrot#Visual_arts
for an impressive list, or this site
for brief examples of Pierrot through the arts).
Since Gaga aspires to
bring pop music into the arena of high art – after all, her motto since the
onset of her career has been, “Pop music will never be low brow” – it is
therefore apt that she chose to incarnate Pierrot, a street performer who
essentially infiltrated the fine arts. Furthermore, Betancourt aptly links Gaga’s
adoption of Pierrot to her Manifesto of Little Monsters that appeared in an
interlude video during her Monster Ball Tour, in which she describes herself
as, “something of a devoted jester” for her “kings” and “queens” (i.e., her fan
base).
Gaga is not one to half-ass
anything she does, and so she infuses artistic media with her very existence, making
her persona and her music one – a circumstance that is part and parcel of her
aesthetic. With this in mind, I begin by demonstrating that even though
“Applause” may sound like an upbeat dance song at first blush, details in the
music hint that the single is not necessarily a happy-go-lucky song. DJ White
Shadow, who co-wrote and co-produced “Applause,” even stated in an interview
with Rolling Stone Magazine that the
song might have more serious overtones: “I don’t know, man! … You tap your feet
to a ballad. I might tap my feet to ‘Every Rose Has Its Thorn.’”
In considering the “whole
package,” it is best to examine the cover image as a point of departure, since
that is our first exposure to “Applause.” Gaga’s facial language does not exude
confidence here. Rather, her mouth is vulnerably half-opened and oddly
contorted, and her eyes convey discomfort or estrangement as she stares off
into the distance. In fact, Gaga mentioned to the media that she was nearly in
tears during the photo shoot that produced the cover image. Even the makeup,
deliberately smeared downward around the eyes, is applied to suggest that
Gaga-Pierrot may have been crying. We have seen this physical and emotional
investment in Gaga’s previous transformations: bodily modification via
prosthetics in her “Born This Way” video and thereafter, as well as the rise of
alter egos Yüyi the Mermaid and, more prominently, Jo Calderone, who were both
featured in her “Yoü and I” video.
The music of “Applause”
opens with a simple two-line counterpoint that indicates the song is in the key
of G minor.[1]
There is a hackneyed stereotype in tonal music that associates the major mode
with happiness, whereas the minor mode implies sadness or gravity.[2]
Gaga generally employs the minor mode in order to convey a sad or somber mood
(e.g., “Papparazi,” “Dance in the Dark,” “Alejandro”). This counterpoint
becomes the basis for the ostinato, the bass motive that repeats throughout the
song’s verses, as well as the model for the repeating bass line of the chorus.
The harmony is thus derived from the ostinato bass, yielding a simple
three-chord progression of i-VII-VI for the two verses, which, according to the
rules and conventions of Western tonal music, not only contains altered tones,
but is actually an incomplete progression.[3]
This progression is expanded to i-VII-VI-iv-VII-i during the second half of the
chorus (“Give me that thing that I love /… make ‘em touch”), but still does not
provide an authentic harmonic resolution.
Example 1: Opening
counterpoint, from which accompaniment lines of the chorus section are derived.
The music therefore lacks
a sense of strong direction or resolution due to the absence of solid, conventional
cadences (musical points of arrival), and thus produces the cyclic effect of
“looping.” The minimalist harmonic style and progression, the steady rhythmic
pulse, and the repetition – which were, in fact, championed by the Minimalist
movement in music during the 1960s and 1970s – are not unusual characteristics
of dance/techno tunes. Perhaps this minimalist style is a nod to a new
aesthetic that Gaga has been practicing as a result of her studies with Marina Abramović? Her time
with the performance artist at the Marina Abramović Institute included meditations, nude walks in the woods,
and lengthy drone-like vocal exercises. More importantly, though, this lack of
teleology,[4] a harmonic “wandering”
of sorts, underscores the plight of Pierrot, who is doomed to wander from place
to place alone.
The melodies of the verses
and chorus, including the style in which they are sung, also play a part in
undermining the otherwise upbeat nature of “Applause.” Upon first listening to
the song, I was taken aback by how the key of G minor sits in Gaga’s tessitura,
for the timbre of her voice in that low register (she sings a low G3 and even a
low F3 during the chorus) lends the song a dark and menacing quality. This dark
mood also manifests itself in the black backdrop that pervades the music video.
Moreover, Gaga does not
sing the verses in a declamatory style; rather, the first verse in particular
is intoned in a dejected manner. Even the slight vibrato that I detect at the
end of some words (e.g. “gong” and “wrong”) sounds deliberately weak and shaky.
The vocal style here seems appropriate, though, as the opening lyrics indicate
that Gaga is on the defense: “I stand here waiting for you to bang the gong /
To crash the critic saying, ‘is it right or is it wrong?’” We can thus view her vocal style
as either an expression of her agitation, or the sonic equivalent of Pierrot’s
pantomiming, which must be exaggerated for the sake of his audience.
Indeed, the latter idea is supported by the overall disjunct melodic contour of
the verses – characterized by leaps, as opposed to smooth, stepwise motion – much
like a pantomime’s angular gestures might be. The video seems to suggest a little
of both while the first verse unfolds, as Gaga dances around awkwardly in a
large cage (symbolizing her tongue-in-cheek metaphorical entrapment by the
hateful media), like a guinea pig running on a forever-turning wheel.
It should also be noted
that the melodies in “Applause” center on the third degree of the scale, which
is B-flat in the key of G minor.[5]
Gaga also features the interval of a minor third (G to B-flat) prominently in
this song. In keeping with the stereotype of the minor mode conveying a serious
mood, the flatted third of the scale and the interval of a minor third (G to B-flat)
are both traditionally supposed to impart a doleful effect upon the listener.
Example 2: Beginning of
the chorus, with harmonic analysis.
B-flats and G to B-flat
intervals are marked to highlight repetition: vertical arrows point to B-flats,
and curved arrows indicate the G to B-flat intervals.
This detail lends the chorus
a contradictory undertone as the lyrics suggest excitement and confidence:
I live for the applause,
applause, applause
I live for the
applause-plause, live for the applause-plause
Live for the way that you
cheer and scream for me
The applause, applause,
applause
Give me that thing that I
love
(Turn the lights on)
Put your hands up, make ‘em
touch
(Make it real loud)
Give me that thing that I
love
(Turn the lights on)
Put your hands up, make ‘em
touch
(Make it real loud)
A-P-P-L-A-U-S-E
Make it real loud
A-P-P-L-A-U-S-E
Put your hands up, make ‘em
touch, touch
A-P-P-L-A-U-S-E
Make it real loud
A-P-P-L-A-U-S-E
Put your hands up, make ‘em
touch, touch
In sum, the tonality,
melodic contour, and intervals highlighted throughout the song give the
impression that there is more to “Applause” than its cheerful, upbeat tempo. As
a result, the music keeps in line with the sentiments and character of
Gaga-Pierrot.
In terms of the music
itself, I am not a fan of “Applause” and am quite disappointed with it. I think
it ties with “LoveGame” as Gaga’s worst single to date. And yet “Applause” has
been stuck in my head every day for over a week now – how could this be? The
answer surely lies in the song’s repetitive qualities. In my attempt to
rationalize my dislike for the song with its failure to dislodge itself from my
brain, I could not help but recall the work of an unlikely German philosopher
of a different era, whose theory about repetition in music can be applied to 21st-century
pop music listening practices.
* * *
“The world consists of repetition.
Repetition is actuality and the earnestness of existence.”
–Søren Kierkegaard, Repetition
Theodore Adorno, a member
of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory, was also a composer and
musicologist who wrote extensively on the nexus between music, society,
modernity, technology, mass culture, and more, between the years of 1929 and
1969.[6] In
his 1941 essay, “On Popular Music,” Adorno writes that one requirement that
popular music must meet in order to be considered “popular” is that it should
contain stimuli in order to provoke the listener’s attention (Adorno 444). In
addition, Adorno stresses that pop culture’s listening habits are rooted in
recognition: one need only repeat something until it is recognized in order to
make it accepted (452). In other words, if a = repetition, b = recognition, and
c = acceptance, then repetition = acceptance by the transitive property of
equality. When Gaga repeatedly declares that she lives for our applause, and
instructs us to put our hands up and make them touch, the message rouses the listener’s
attention because an imperative directed at us, her listeners, is being
hammered again and again into the foreground of our sonic space. In fact, the
word “applause” is heard (either sung or spelled out) an astounding 42 times in approximately three and a
half minutes.
Gaga also relies on other
musical elements in order to sustain our attention and coax us into applauding
for her. Since there exists a desire to tangibly synchronize our bodies with
music in our compulsion to tap/snap to the beat of any song, the repetitive
backbeat produced by the synthesizer encourages us to do so, but our compulsion
to “feel the music” is instead channeled into clapping because of the lyrics. The
desire to make us applaud is even embedded in the eighth-note repetition of the
word in the chorus, in which “applause-plause” takes on an onomatopoeic
function as the rhythm mimics the sound of hands clapping. There is
also the hand clapping sound simulated by the synthesizer whenever the chorus
occurs, beginning at 1:08. These details all serve to provoke our attention.
In addition to utilizing
sound effects to encourage us to clap, Gaga also inserts a vocal layer that
unfolds simultaneously with the chorus section, “Make it real loud / Put your
hands up, make ‘em touch, touch”; this second layer spells out the word
“applause,” and subliminally encourages us to applaud her – just in case we
haven’t gotten the message yet. In fact, Gaga employs a subtler technique from
the start of the song to subconsciously assert her need for our applause. As a
friend of mine with discerning ears pointed out, the sound that immediately
echoes Gaga as she sings the first verse (beginning at 0:14) sounds like Gaga’s
voice saying “applause”; however, it is truncated to just an audible initial
sound (“aw”), with the high and extremely low frequencies filtered out and the
frequencies that correspond to the bass line amplified. This truncation creates
tension, as the brain seeks out the familiar (i.e., the complete word) only to
hear a snippet of it as an eerie timbre, thereby encouraging us to listen
further in anticipation of the full word.
Finally, at 2:44, Gaga’s
insistence on applause, combined with the underlying dance rhythm, reaches a
climax as she sings, “Now, now, now,” and the synthesized clapping crescendos
to become flesh as a recording of audience members clapping and screaming takes
over our sonic space. This type of manipulative “hyping” is what I consider to
be a 21st-century example of “glamouring,” a term that Adorno used to describe
a song’s “now we present” attitude in order to capture the listener’s attention
(448).[7]
Glamouring is part of the process of “plugging” that helps make a song
successful, and helps create a memorable hook.[8] In
fact, Adorno’s take on glamouring seems to align with Gaga’s aesthetic
strikingly well: “All glamour is bound up in trickery. Listeners are nowhere
more tricked in popular music than in its glamourous passages” (449). Gaga’s
glamouring occurs not at the beginning of her song, as one would expect, but
rather at the end so that she may secure our applause through the song’s final
moments.
The music
video supports Gaga’s need for our applause in the use of the hand
as a focal point, the first and most obvious instance being Gaga’s hand
clapping throughout the video. At 0:19, her left hand is positioned above her
head as if to grasp our attention – a visual glamouring, perhaps?
At 1:23, she is poised
between two large, sinister hands that recall Ursula’s “Poor Unfortunate Souls”
scene in The Little Mermaid.
Moreover, the choreography features hand gestures (see the dance sequence from
1:49, and the use of jazz hands at 2:02), and during the dance she dons a bra
and panties made to look like hands grabbing a body with an accompanying hand
“choker necklace.”
Gaga also positions her
hands over her face in various shots as she plays different characters,
including the image below of Gaga-Pierrot.
Even in the video’s final
shot, Gaga does not fully mouth the letters that spell ARTPOP; rather, she uses
her hands to spell the letters out. In short, the hand becomes a symbol of
approval, acceptance, and power.
* * *
“Only with your happiness
comes mine.”
– Stefani Angelina
Joanne Germanotta
Gaga’s latest Gesamtkunstwerk began with our
introduction to Gaga-Pierrot, followed by the song itself, which provides a
soundscape of Pierrot – an indicator that the visuals and the music complement
each other. The two components were supported by and fused with their
tele-visual component a week later with the premiere of the music video. In
recapitulation, it is therefore the ubiquitous element of repetition in
the song – whether it is in the iteration of the word “applause” in the music
itself through various techniques, or in the showcasing of hands in various
forms/media in the video – that lends a psychological significance to
“Applause.”
The question is: Why is
Gaga so insistent upon our physical laudation? Why does she require our
acceptance?
The choice to personify Pierrot reveals
that Gaga sees much of herself in him: as a “devoted jester,” she entertains
and pines for our affections. However, as the musicologist Susan Youens put it,
“Pierrots were endemic everywhere in late-nineteenth/early-twentieth-century
Europe as an archetype of the self-dramatizing artist, who presents to the
world a stylized mask both to symbolize and veil artistic ferment, to
distinguish the creative artist from the human being” (Youens 96). At times,
Gaga feels vulnerable, isolated, and brilliantly tormented because she will
always be subject to the ridicule and criticism of her audience.
Indeed, one can search the
Internet and find dozens of acerbic reviews of the music video, which premiered
48 hours ago (at the time I’m now writing). People are growing tired of Gaga
and her antics; to some, she is already old hat. It should also be noted that
the tabloids had a field day last fall when Gaga gained 25 pounds. There were
hyperbolic claims that her career would be over soon, with one magazine using
the sensationalist headline “Lady Gaga Hits Rock Bottom” – a headline that Gaga
actually foreshadowed to the letter in her 2010 “Paparazzi” video. It seems as
though Gaga, a “slave
to our approval,” whose persona is produced as a result of fan
devotion, needs her fan base to persist more than ever before. As Ella
Bedard, another Gaga Stigmata
contributor, once wrote: “She is only
insofar as she exists in the public’s eyes.” A veritable Tinkerbell, Gaga will
no longer exist if we stop clapping for her. Therein lies the reason for Gaga’s
quest for approbation.
In effect, central
to Gaga’s total artwork is the use of technology not just as a primary
receptive mode for fans to consume her product, but also as a means of
self-preservation. Gaga advertised extensively for the premiere of
“Applause” in the weeks leading up to it with tweets, facebook updates,
partnership with Vevo, and a culminating appearance on the ABC network show
“Good Morning America” in NYC the morning of its premiere. With such extensive
and preemptive plugging, “Applause” became a hit before the fact. When the
video finally premiered, the world naturally devoured it.
But Gaga does not stop
there. Pushing the boundaries of a Gesamtkunstwerk
further, Gaga has announced that the release of the ARTPOP album in November will coincide with the release of a free ARTPOP app, an “interactive jewel case”
as she describes it, in which fans will be able to communicate and socialize
with other fans. ARTPOP will thus be
a musical-artistic-technological experience that will link Gaga, her music, and
her fans to everyone around the world in
real time. By inserting her work into the primary digital cultural space
that her fans occupy – a habitus, as Betancourt
aptly describes it, characterized by mobile devices and their applications,
tablets, and mobile media – Gaga is not only preserving her fandom, her
success, and her existence, but also securing it for the future. As she reminds
us in her manifesto, “We are nothing without our image. Without our projection.
Without the spiritual hologram of who we perceive ourselves to be, or rather to
become, in the future.”
In the end,
Gaga/Gaga-Pierrot gets the last laugh at the critics and the haters, for she
has yet again redefined the concept of a total artwork and executed it
successfully by staying one step ahead of her consumers in their ever-changing,
fast-paced world of electronic gadgets and digital media. In fact, Gaga
gets the last round of applause: the sound of one hand clapping… the sound of
her self-congratulatory pat on the back. Like her or hate her, and say what you will about her, folks, but
there is no denying that she has done it again.
P.S. Lady Gaga, if you
happen to be reading this: on behalf of all Gaga
Stigmata writers, thank you for acknowledging
music scholars!
[1] The song is technically in
the Aeolian mode, since the key here is G natural
minor, one of the three types of minor scales. I will refer to it simply as a
minor scale for ease of readership, though.
[2] It must be
noted that pitches and scales do not
possess emotions. The concept that music has the potential to arouse an affect
within the listener began with the ancient Greeks, but was promulgated from the
17th century onward, most notably with the Doctrine of Affections. This theory
of musical aesthetics bestowed many tonal scales – as well as intervals
within a scale, tempi, and other musical elements – with emotional states of
being. The oversimplification and stereotyping of “major as happy” and “minor
as sad” stems from this theory.
[3] The complete progression would be
i-VII-VI-V-i, and contains the dominant chord, V, which is a necessary chord
for the “proper” resolution of harmonic tension in tonal music. This descending
minor tetrachord sequence, which can be traced back to the music of the ancient
Greeks, has occasionally appeared in Western music throughout the centuries. It
also gained popularity in several genres of music during the 1960s.
[4] The song isn’t entirely non-teleological; after all, the chorus melodies differ
from the verse melody, and the chorus accompaniment lines develop out of the
bass line of the first verse.
[5] In music
theory, the flatted third degree (flatted because it is in the minor mode) is
the distinguishing factor between a major sonority and a minor one, along with
the sixth and seventh scale degrees.
[6] Adorno’s
essays stand out for his unabashed exaltation of “serious” music (high art
music, especially of German origin), and his scathing criticisms of pop music,
or what he referred to as “vulgar” music. Adorno was writing about popular
music of the 1920s and 1930s; therefore, his idea of pop music was the
jazz-inspired dance music of that age. While his essays provide insight into
the capitalist-driven nature of popular culture and music via Marxist ideology,
his sweeping dismissal and stereotyping of jazz music is, in my opinion,
erroneous.
[7] Adorno uses the background music that
plays while the lion roars in an MGM studios production as a classic instance
of glamouring.
[8] Plugging relies not just upon elements
in the music, but also upon the artist and manager, advertising, media,
technology, etc, in order to standardize a song and make it a hit.
Works
Cited
Adorno,
Theodore. “On Popular Music.” Essays On
Popular Music. Ed. Richard Leppert.
Trans.
Susan H. Gillespie. Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 2002.
437-469.
Print.
Youens,
Susan. “Excavating an Allegory: The Text of Pierrot Lunaire.” Journal of the
Arnold
Schoenberg
Institute 8 (1984):
94-115. Print.
Author
Bio:
Ayah Rifai is a
clarinetist, musicologist, and music educator. She holds a Master’s degree in
Historical Musicology/Music Theory from Stony Brook University, and is
currently pursuing a doctorate in music education at Boston University. She
teaches hundreds of her own little monsters at P.S. 264, The Bay Ridge
Elementary School for the Arts, in Brooklyn, New York.











[3] - i-VII-VI-V is actually a phrigian tetrachord
ReplyDeleteThe singing style in the verses puts me in mind of Joan Crawford. And linking to that, Bette Davis and her garish makeup in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? She too was wearing the loose white Pierrot-like smock.
ReplyDelete